On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally my view is as follows. Science does not need to intuitively > explain all > aspects of our experience: what it has to do is make predictions about > finite sets of finite-precision observations, based on previously-collected > finite sets of finite-precision observations.
I can do one better than that. If you don't believe that AGI is possible then bugger right off. We don't want your mysticism around here. Is it too much to ask that the people on this list be interested in the topic? If you don't think it's possible, go back to your cave and pray for our souls or something. Trent ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
