> The neuron = concept > 'theory' is extremely broken: it is so broken, that when neuroscientists > talk about bayesian contingencies being calculated or encoded by spike > timing mechanisms, that claim is incoherent.
This is not always true ... in some cases there are solidly demonstrated connections between neurally computed bayesian contingencies and observed perceptual and motor phenomena in organisms... I agree that no one knows how abstract concepts are represented in the brain, but for sensorimotor stuff it is not the case that work on bayesian population coding in the brain is "incoherent" ben g ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=120640061-aded06 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
