On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Ben Goertzel <b...@goertzel.org> wrote: > > I happened to use CopyCat in a university AI class I taught years ago, so I > got some experience with it > > It was **great** as a teaching tool, but I wouldn't say it shows anything > about what can or can't work for AGI, really... >
CopyCat gives a general feel of "self-assembling" representation and operations performed on reflexive level. It captures intuitions about high-level perception better than any other self-contained description I've seen (which is rather sad, especially given that CopyCat only touches on using hand-made shallow multilevel representations, without inventing them, without learning). Some of the things happening in my model of high-level representation (on the rights of description of what's happening, not as elements of model itself) can be naturally described using lexicon from CopyCat (slippages, temperature, salience, structural analogy), even though algorithm on the low level is different. -- Vladimir Nesov robot...@gmail.com http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=123753653-47f84b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
