Ronald C. Blue wrote:
I would agree that we are mutually close in ideas. Also current
programming efforts at AI will not be wasted because those action packs
can be used as seed for any AGI machine that has self control and
awareness. Actually there are many paths to new AGI machines, we even
went around our own original patent application but maintained the
fundamental of the theoretical model of AGI based on the Correlational
Holographic Opponent Processing model of the human mind. So far it
seems as our approach is the best direction relative to others published
research and models. Future direction and success is unknowable.
You are correct that the heart of the AGI device is modeling the
opponent-process which is creative into a physical circuit duplicating
these paradoxical analogies. In so doing we have
discover some rather odd unexpected behavior. Considering the 13 or B
problem which is really based on our experiences of 13 or B. A
primitive African cattle herdsman might see the milk producing breast of
the cows. The point of view is that the observer collapses the meaning
from stimuli and the stimuli do not cause the meaning. Only an AGI that
is self aware can do this. The odd thing about the circuit is that you
get different results when you measure either side of the opponent
process circuit. Also the measurement destroys the information. If you
don't measure it, it works.
Why B over 13.... Memory or priming and habituation are keys for
creative shifts in perception. Goodness of fit of a stimulus after
rotational and interference analysis results in a temporary conclusion.
That conclusion can be habituated which cause another probability to
express itself.
Using your bicycle or bull pictures as an example
http://cn.cl2000.com/history/beida/ysts/image18/jpg/02.jpg
MINUS
http://www.chu.cam.ac.uk/images/departments/classics_bulls_head_rhyton.jpg
EQUALS
So you can see that there is a goodness of fit between the two stimuli.
Also notice that new
knowledge is a product of allowing fact or identities to interact with
each other.
My program skills were inadequate compared to the ability of the human
brain for creating the
analysis but you got the idea.
A average woman is a beautiful woman. The average woman is the average
of all women we have ever met.
A average theory of all the facts is a beautiful theory of the facts
that we know. Variability comes from the realization that
each person has a rich history of experiences. Those stored average
memories of identities is what we use to
judge our current experiences and occasion jump out of of comfort zone.
Once the jump has occurred there is no going back.
We have two brains (actually 4). One brain see tiny details and one
brain sees the whole or big emotional
pictures. When we combine that information we making a great leap
forward. A good AGI machine has to do the same.
Ron
Please do not include images in your posts.
The usual etiquette is to put them on a web server somewhere and give
pointers in your message sent to the list.
Thankyou
Richard Loosemore
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=126863270-d7b0b0
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
