On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Andrea
Tomasini<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Jun, 2009, at 23:38 , Allen Bierbaum wrote:
>
>> The one potential problem I can see with the current licensing
>> proposed is that an organization with several very small teams
>> (feature teams for example) is going to end up with a fairly high cost
>> compared to other solutions.
> Sure, the idea is that a Scrum Team, is 1 Scrum Master, 1 Product
> Owner and up to 9 Team Members :-) That is 11 people working for about
> 10 € per month including professional support and just-in-time
> bugfixing and workaround... which is not much, at least seen from
> here. We are very open to discuss this, and hear from all of you what
> do you think it would be reasonable :-)
>
>> Have you given any thought to having a "grouped" user license or
>> something?  Maybe along the lines of each "team" being 10 developers.
>> Thus a company with 7 developers and 5 teams would only pay for one
>> "team" license?
> Well that doesn't really sound Scrum :-) Anyway you could still have a
> big team, only one, with all the people inside, and use the same
> license on 5 different "Product" (Agilo Project) just assigning to the
> Sprint a Capacity only to the Team Members working on that Sprint :-)

I have been trying to do this "just assigning to the Sprint a Capacity
only to the Team Members working on that Sprint", but I can't figure
out how.  I am probably missing something big.

How do I adjust the capacity a team member has for a specific sprint?
(ie. split their time between sprints)

-Allen

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Agilo for Scrum" group. This group is moderated by agile42 GmbH 
http://www.agile42.com and is focused in supporting Agilo for Scrum users.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/agilo?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to