I protoed these about a month ago and never proposed them. Proposal: 2158 changes. (AI=2)
Amend Rule 2158 by replacing: Within a judicial case, one or more judicial questions may arise. Each judicial question is either inapplicable (default) or applicable; this is not a persistent status but is evaluated instantaneously. Each judicial question either is open (default), suspended, or has a particular judgement; this is a persistent status that changes only according to the rules. The possible types of judgement for a judicial question vary according to the type of question. When a judicial case has an applicable open judicial question, it requires a judge, and its judge CAN assign a valid judgement to that question by announcement. Whenever there is a judge assigned to a judicial case with an applicable open question, the judge SHALL assign such a judgement to the question as soon as possible. Whenever a judicial case has a judicial question that has remained applicable and open, while the same judge has been assigned to the case, continuously for the past week, the CotC CAN recuse that judge with cause by announcement. Whenever a judicial case has a judicial question that has remained applicable and open, while the same judge has been assigned to the case, continuously for the past two weeks, the CotC SHALL so recuse the judge as soon as possible. with: Within a judicial case, one or more judicial questions may arise. Each judicial question is either inapplicable (default) or applicable, as defined by the rules. Suspension is a judicial question switch, tracked by the CotC, with values of Null (default) and Suspended. A judicial question is open if it does not have a judgement. The possible types of judgement for a judicial question vary according to the type of question. When a judicial case has an applicable open judicial question, it requires a judge, and its judge SHALL as soon as possible assign a valid judgement to that question by announcement. Whenever a judicial case has a judicial question that has remained applicable and open, while the same judge has been assigned to the case, continuously for the past week, the CotC SHALL within two weeks recuse that judge with cause by announcement. [[Switchifies status, thereby removing the annoying evaluated clauses. Takes advantage of the fact that specifying a method implies CAN to add brevity.]] Proposal: Stare Decisis (AI=1) Create a new rule, at power=1, titled "Stare Decisis": The CotC's Monthly Report shall include the Stare Decisis, which is a list of past CFJs. The following information shall be included for each CFJ: (i) its statement; (ii) the date on which it was called; (iii) the status of each of its judicial questions. Whenever a CFJ is made, the CotC shall add it to the list. E may, at eir discretion, add earlier CFJs. E may Without Objection remove any CFJ e deems no longer relevant from the list.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
