On Dec 19, 2007 3:58 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1832 > > ============================== CFJ 1832 ============================== > > Type: equity case > > Contract: AFO and pikhq's contract concerning voting on proposal 5365 > > State of affairs: The vote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FOR proposal 5365. > > Initiator: comex > The AFO has failed to comply with the contract as directed. Although the AFO has since retracted it's most recent vote on 5365, it still cast the vote and therefore is still in violation of provision 1 of the contract. While the retraction of the violating vote could be considered adequate remedy, this judge finds otherwise, as the voting period for proposal 5365 will end before this judgment becomes binding. Therefore the following shall be the binding judgment in this case:
Whereas the AFO has acted against its obligations to pikhq as stated in the contract regarding proposal 5365, the AFO shall remedy this breach of contract by not voting on a future proposal as selected by the player pikhq. In order for the AFO to fulfill this obligation, the player pikhq shall specify by announcement a proposal of eir choice of which the following is true: a) It's voting period has not yet ended b) The AFO has not yet voted on that proposal Upon such an announcement, the AFO shall refrain from voting on that proposal. When that proposal reaches the end of its voting period, this agreement shall terminate. If no such announcement has been made within 30 days of the issuance of this judgment agreement, this agreement shall terminate. Equity Judge BobTHJ
