I call for judgement on the statement:
* If the offer in the evidence section (1) were published by me, then
accepted, any person would be able to become a party to the resultant
contract by announcement.
Evidence (1):
I intend to agree with Goethe that if e wears a hat, I will also wear a hat.
Evidence (2):
Rule 2198/0 (Power=1.5)
Making Contract Changes
...
If a contract does not purport to regulate becoming a party to
it, than any person CAN become a party to it by announcement.
Evidence (3):
> There is a lot that you can read into a contract. If I made a public
> post "I intend to agree with comex to do X", the implicit inclusion
> of your name is the exception (comex can join) that proves the rule
> (no one else can join). But also, there is implicit the notion of
> binding, etc.
