On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:18 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, ehird wrote:
> >> On 5 Oct 2008, at 14:41, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> >>> That's odd... which rule is saying that an AI=3 proposal can affect a P=4
> >>> rule?
> >> Rule 2140/0 (Power=3)
> >> is power 3. Thus AI=3 proposals are ominipotent.
> > So a power-4 Rule is amendable at AI-3, but not by just saying "the
> > following power-4 proposal is amended to read..."
> How do you get that? The rule says that "No entity with power below
> [3] can...modify any other substantive aspect of an instrument with
> power greater than its own." It plainly does not apply to power-3
> instruments.
I submit the following proposal (AI=3.1, II=1, Title="This one probably
ought to fail..."):
{{{
Increase the power of rule 2140 to 3.1.
}}}
--
ais523
