On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 12:49 -0400, comex wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:56 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: > >> Proposal pool: empty > > > > I NoV against comex for violating the power-2 rule 1742 by violating the > > PNP by causing it to fail to meet all its obligations. I contest that > > NoV and initiate a criminal case on it, submitting the above as > > arguments. > > Invalid NoV, woggle already NoVed me for the same
Oh, does that make the NoV invalid, or just redundant? I contest woggle's NoV on the same subject as the above-quoted NoV attempt, and initiate a criminal CFJ on it, submitting the same arguments. (If this created two CFJs somehow, I recommend the ALREADY TRIED subreason of NOT GUILTY on one of them.) -- ais523
