NoV: G. violated the Power-1 Rule 2224 by making proposals disinterested as quoted in the evidence section.
I contest this NoV and initiate a criminal case regarding it. Arguments: It is unclear how G. might have submitted a proposal to repeal either Rule 1750 or Rule 2161 whose effects were limited to correcting errors and/or ambiguities. However, I suppose e could have resigned the office... Evidence: On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > I submit the following proposal, "NaN", AI-1, II-0: > I submit the following proposal, "Other documents" AI-1, II-0: > I submit the following proposal, "Proposal Points", AI=Mutable, II-0: >From Rule 2309, Fearmongor's duties: 2) For each of those rules, submit a disinterested proposal with AI equal to that rules' power. >From Rule 2224: The submitter of a proposal SHALL set its interest index to 0 if and only if the proposal's effects are limited to correcting errors and/or ambiguities.
