I make an inquiry CfJ on the following statement: "GUILTY (regardless of the sentence) is never an appropriate judgment on a criminal case where the defendant is a Slave Golem."
Evidence (Rule 1504): "GUILTY with a valid sentence, appropriate if the judge finds, beyond a reasonable doubt, that ALL of the following are true... (d) the Accused could have reasonably believed that the alleged act did violate the specified rule; (e) the Accused could have reasonably avoided committing the breach without committing a different breach of equal or greater severity." Arguments: Slave Golems are mindless legal constructs, and therefore incapable of believing anything. They also lack free will; their actions are entirely determined by the actions of other persons. Therefore, in any cases where a slave golem violated a rule, that golem could not have acted any differently and therefore could not have avoided violating that rule.
