On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:54 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote:
> Proposal: The Logic that Never Was (AI=3)
>
> Amend Rule 217 (Interpreting the Rules) by appending:
>
> In general, the gamestate only changes as explicitly envisioned
> by the Rules. That an absurdity may be concluded from the
> assumption that a change does not occur does not cause it to
> occur.
I retract this and submit:
Proposal: The Logic that Never Was (AI=3)
Amend Rule 217 (Interpreting the Rules) by appending:
In general, the gamestate only changes as explicitly envisioned
by the Rules, and an absurdity that can be concluded from the
assumption that a statement is false does not constitute proof
that it is true.
