On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 14:40 -0500, Nic Evans wrote: > As will be mentioned below, this charter doesn't stop CEOs from > violating SHALLs and so I think the CEO can just refuse to ever > assess.
Right, an Organization isn't a Contract or a Pledge, although people seem to be using it as one. The intended use of Organizations was that people are punished via increasing their Expenditure and/or preventing them from leaving, as a method of creating an Expenditure economy. People don't seem to actually be using them like that, though. (Theory about Agora: no matter how you try to design the actual rules around an agreement-like system, people will attempt to force it to act like a contract. We've already seen that with Agencies that create pledges, which is pretty much a pure contract-equivalent. It happened with Promises too.) -- ais523
