On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 10:33 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
> For the avoidance of confusion, I intend in four days, without
> objection, to ratify the document contained within the parentheses. I
> am aware that the document is inaccurate and could be fixed with a
> reasonable effort. The nature of the error is that it states a player
> has not judged a CFJ when e has actually judged it. The reason
> for ratifying it is the avoidance of confusion in a judgement that
> has already caused too much.
>
> {{V.J Rada never submitted a judgement in CFJ 3537}}
I object:
1. {{ }} is not actually parentheses, thus making your request possibly
too ambiguous to succeed;
2. This seems likely to cause more confusion, not less. Also, confusion
as to the status of a CFJ isn't a major issue with the gamestate
that needs drastic measures to fix, because we always have the
option of just forgetting about the original CFJ and calling a new
one.
--
ais523
