On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 23:12 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee I vote as follows: > 7869* babelian 2.0 Agoraculture v. 2.0 babelian 10 sh. AGAINST. I'm not necessarily opposed to the idea but this needs much more development before passing it (plus likely attention from someone skilled in understanding how Agoran rules and precedents affect how it's possible to interfere with proposal voting). It may be that we need a framework for screwing-with-votes that's more complex and general than the current one. > 7870* V.J Rada 2.0 Cards are appealable 2.0 V.J Rada 10 sh. AGAINST; criminialising dependent action intents makes me really uneasy (given that intents aren't actually actions, and are often required to keep a player's options open; in some past rulesets, we've required almost every statement to the public fora to be truthful, with the exception of dependent action intents) > 7871* V.J Rada 3.0 Minor fixes (sans typos) V.J Rada 10 sh. FOR, very much so
-- ais523
