> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:16 PM, Owen Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Oct 1, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: >>> I CFJ (with AP): in the below-quoted message, V.J. Rada issued a claim of >>> error. >> >> >> This above CFJ statement is CFJ 3568. I assign it to o. >> >> >> ======================================================================== >> >> Caller's Arguments (from Discussion): >> >> VJ's message does not explain the scope and nature of the perceived >> error, as required by rule 2201 to make a claim of error. >> >> ======================================================================== > > I find this CFJ to be TRUE, following the caller’s arguments exactly. The > alleged claim of error was > >> CoE this is bugging me. > > Sent in response to an attempt to collect a report award, and without any > trivially obvious error in either the reward attempt or the report, this is > insufficient for a claim of error.
I file a Motion to Reconsider this judgement, and re-issue judgement as below: I find this CFJ to be FALSE, following the caller’s arguments exactly. The alleged claim of error was > CoE this is bugging me. Sent in response to an attempt to collect a report award, and without any trivially obvious error in either the reward attempt or the report, this is insufficient for a claim of error. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
