I don't understand 3594 either. I intend to call a motion for
reconsideration with two support on the grounds that 1: the judgement
seemed to consider best interests of the game using facts after the calling
of the CFJ, rather than the best interests of the game with each blanket
interpretation of the rules and 2: the judgement appeared to invalidate a
rules clause for the best interests of the game, which is obviously not
possible.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> ========================================================================
> COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 19 Nov 2017]
>
> * PUBLIC REMINDER to PSS, G., and Aris
> You have judgements that are late or nearly late! See below.
>
> * I've dropped Nichdel from the list of judges as e hasn't been around.
> Can re-add at request!
>
> Open Cases (CFJs)
> ------------------------
> [* = overdue, ! = <24 hours before deadline]
>
> 3591* Motioned to Publius (due Sat, 18 Nov 2017 ~03:14:10)
> 3595! Assigned to G. (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:14:02)
> 3596! Assigned to G. (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:16:00)
> 3597! Assigned to Aris (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:19:51)
>
> 3598 Assigned to ATMunn (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~19:56:44)
> 3599 Assigned to o (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:01:43)
> 3600 Assigned to o (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:01:43)
> 3601 Assigned to o (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:01:43)
> 3602 Assigned to Telnaior (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:03:30)
> 3603 Assigned to Alexis (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:07:06)
> 3604 Assigned to Alexis (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:09:22)
>
>
> Recently-Delivered Verdicts and Implications
> --------------------------------------------
> [** = consider for rules annotation, ! = delivered late]
>
> **3592 by o: If a purported report is missing required information, it
> is not a report.
>
> 3593 by ATMunn: a collection of puns without a final punchline can be
> "a truly hideous pun" as per R1650.
>
> 3594 bt Telnaior: confusion in Medal of Honour definition ("month" and
> "7 days") somehow made the rule not work (a bit confused on the logic of
> the judge's arguments myself).
>
>
> Bench Roster
>
> Judge Court[***] Recent
> ----- ----- ------
> G. Night 3556, 3567, 3563, 3579, 3580, 3582, 3595, 3596
> Publius Night 3558, 3561, 3574, 3576, 3591
> Corona Night
> o Day 3568, 3565, 3572, 3584, 3590, 3592, 3599-3601
> Aris Day 3557, 3562, 3577, 3578, 3589, 3597
> V.J. Rada Day 3585
> Telnaior Day 3586, 3594, 3602
> Alexis Weekend 3573, 3581, 3587, 3588, 3603, 3604
> ATMunn Weekend 3593, 3598
>
>
> Highest Numbered Case: 3604
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [***] Court Descriptions
>
> Day Court [Default, rotate roster through as needed].
>
> Night Court [Assigned quick turnaround cases (either trivial or
> game-urgent), generally promises to judge in 4 days].
>
> Weekend Court [Backup/partial rotation, generally gets half as many
> cases each as Day Court].
>
> Courts are informal relative levels of "interest" in judging as per
> R991. Players can change Court by notifying the Arbitor.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> DISCLAIMER
> Informational only - No actions are contained in this report.
> Information in this report is NOT self-ratifying.
>
> ========================================================================
>
>
>
>
--
>From V.J. Rada
