On 2017-11-21 20:24, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Nov 21, 2017, at 4:14 AM, Telnaior <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2017-11-21 19:57, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Incidentally, I think the distribution rules, fiddly though they are, are
actually working as intended, but I want to get other players’ perspective on
them. The same handful of players have repeatedly benefitted from them without
spending any Shinies, but we’ve reached a level where there are now a
significant number of players with “the fewest” shinies, instead of only two.
-o
Worth noting this only lasts as long as people don't try to game the system,
which has already been threatened with one of the new systems.
In related news, I transfer a shiny to Agora to create the contract "Telnaior Asset
Holding Contract (TAHC)":
{
Telnaior CAN amend, repeal, or retitle this contract by announcement. This
contract accepts all assets. Telnaior can cause this contract to transfer any
asset in its possession by announcement.
}
I transfer all of my shinies to TAHC.
(VJ Rada's scam attempt irritated me, sorry)
I duly cause Agora to distribute the following payments:
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 09:14:17 ? Telnaior paid Agora 1 sh.
In total, 1 shiny must be distributed. I cause Agora to pay as follows:
* 1 sh. to Telnaior (0 -> 1 sh.)
Enjoy your free contract! I’m not sure whether this contract has fulfilled its
purpose, so I’ll refrain from destroying it, but I will note that any player can
destroy it with two consent, for any reason, excepting that “Players SHOULD NOT use
the methods in this paragraph to further their private interests."
This contract will not be exempt from sustenance payments, but I doubt they’ll
tick fast enough to matter for your purposes.
-o
I'm going to transfer that shiny to Aris as an apology for the blatant
plagiarism.
(Ugh I can feel the imaginary DM threatening to shift my alignment, I
feel kinda bad >_>)
(Oh well, in for a penny in for a pound)
