I do not consent to abiding by any rule stating that I cannot register
as a player.
I register as a player.
I free-CFJ on the following statement: "ATMunn is a player."
Arguments:
Rule 869 states that "An Unregistered person CAN (unless explicitly
forbidden or prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message
that indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
intends to become a player at that time. A player CAN deregister (cease
being a player) by announcement. If e does so, e CANNOT register or be
registered for 30 days."
This reasonably implies that if a player deregisters, e is not allowed
to register again for 30 days.
The problem arises when you look at the very next paragraph: "A person,
by registering, agrees to abide by the Rules. The Rules CANNOT otherwise
bind a person to abide by any agreement without that person's willful
consent."
Before I sent this message, I was not a player. Therefore, the rules
CANNOT bind me to abide by them. This means that I do not have to abide
by the rule stating that I cannot register.
There is also the statement in a later paragraph stating a similar
thing: "The Rules CANNOT compel non-players to act without their express
or reasonably implied consent."
I clearly did not give consent to the rules compelling me to not be able
to register, so they CANNOT compel me to do so by the above rule.
So, I call for a verdict of TRUE. Feel free to argue away.
