Sigh.  I deputize for the REFEREE to resolve the finger-pointing as indicated
below.

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> >I deputize for the Registrar
> 
> You'll have to do this again.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> > GUESS WHAT:  It's worse than that.  There *is* no Referee's weekly report!
> > There's no place I can find that puts together "referee" and "Report".
> >
> > While the rules say the Referee is the "recordkeepor" for pledges,
> > it doesn't say that it's part of a Report.  R2143 says that if something is
> > "part of a report" without saying each one, it's part of the weekly report.
> > The same is true for Blots (R2555).  No report defined.
> >
> > I don't think there's anything in the rules that says that merely saying
> > "recordkeepor" means "part of report"?  In fact, the only thing 
> > "recordkeepor"
> > does that I can find is make that quantity restricted as per R2125, I can't
> > find any requirement to publish the record - the requirement comes from
> > explicitly saying something is part of a report.  Of course this is a bug,
> > it *should* be part of a report, but for the technicality of the recent
> > deputization success this is important.  Is this clear enough or is it
> > CFJ-worthy do you think?
> >
> >
> > SO TO CONVERGE THE GAMESTATE IF THE OFFICE IS VACANT:
> >
> > I deputize for the Registrar conclude the investigation into Aris's recent
> > finger-pointing as follows:
> >
> > The facts are correct.  Cold Hand of Justice Imposed:
> >
> > 2 Blots is the base penalty.  I think a first offense of a missed report
> > should start with the lowest penalty (lowest common infraction as a
> > baseline).  So I levy a fine of 1 blot on VJ Rada.
> >
> > This is forgivable, so does not take away salary for this month (no words
> > specified for the apology).
> >
> > I'm not sure for future if the 2nd or 3rd missed report (14 or 21 days
> > of "no work") would be the threshold for unforgivable for the purposes of
> > losing a month's salary.
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >> I point my finger at V.J. Rada for failing to publish the Notary's weekly
> >> report. In general I agreee with G.'s two week rule, but in this case the
> >> person responsible failed to publish the report after being elected to the
> >> office.
> >>
> >> -Aris
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> >> Alert: As this report does not contain pledges, it is no report at
> >> all. You are no referee but a mere IMPOSTOR
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I deputize for the Referee to publish the following weekly report:
> >> >
> >> >                  ------------------------
> >> >                   Referee's Weekly Report
> >> >                  ------------------------
> >> >
> >> >    No one has any Blots.  No instances of blots currently exist.
> >> >
> >> >                  -----end of report------
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I resign Referee. Gnomic is starting to get inertia with its initial
> >> >> culture and history and I'd like to help it out (it's also why I've been
> >> >> away lately, sorry).
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:47 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> 
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As I mentioned several days ago, I plan in future to point fingers at
> >> >> > officers who miss two successive weekly reports. Just to set a good
> >> >> > standard going forward! (Others may still enforce a tougher standard
> >> >> > if they wish, of course).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > When this week ends in ~28 hours, officers who would be blotted would
> >> >> > be Corona (Herald's weekly) and CuddleBeam (Referee's weekly).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > (If I missed a report my apologies, I'll double-check before 
> >> >> > blotting).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -G.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> From V.J. Rada
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> From V.J. Rada
>

Reply via email to