If the proposal V.J. Rada Equitable Remedy is not pending, I pend it with 1
paper.

~Corona

On Friday, April 13, 2018, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I create the following proposal (all should remember that I did
> already spend a coin to make the contract)
> Title: V.J. Rada Equitable Remedy.
> Text: If the Contract "Hi!" does not exist, create in V.J. Rada's
> possession assets equal to the assets in that Contract at the moment
> before its destruction. If that Contract still exists, destroy it and
> then create in V.J. Rada's possession assets equal to the assets in
> that Contract at the moment before its destruction.
>
> Then, transfer one paper and one coin from V.J. Rada to whoever pended
> this proposal. Then, transfer one coin to any player that voted for
> this proposal.
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > What about amending "Hi" in such a way that everyone gets a coin and VJ
> Rada gets the rest back? I wouldn't object to that.
> >
> > On 10:13, Apr 12, 2018, at 10:13, Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>Sigh. I tend to agree with you, actually. All of your assets is a bit
> >>much.
> >>That might be hard to recover from. However, it isn't terribly
> >>equitable
> >>for you to get off free after attempting a scam, even one that we've
> >>sort
> >>of encouraged with the Boo Lien system. Also, giving all of your assets
> >>to
> >>one contract is always a horrible idea. I'm curious what other think.
> >>Maybe
> >>you should get 1/2 or 3/4 or something of them back? Whatever it is,
> >>we'd
> >>need to come up with something that no one would object to, considering
> >>that the contract can only be amended without objection (also always a
> >>bad
> >>idea not to provide a way to amend a contract).
> >>
> >>-Aris
> >>
> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:09 AM Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> I really do think that me losing all of my assets over this is
> >>inequitable.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ned Strange
> >><edwardostra...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > That is, I object for myself and PSS to Aris's intent
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Ned Strange
> >><edwardostra...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> I object both for myself and PSS.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Aris Merchant
> >>> >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>> Well, I object. There is no reason we should allow you to reclaim
> >>your
> >>> >>> assets from a badly designed scam contract. I intend, with 2
> >>Agoran
> >>> >>> consent, to destroy the contract "Hi".
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> -Aris
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:13 PM Ned Strange
> >><edwardostra...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> I object and intend to amend "Hi!" without objection to have the
> >>new
> >>> >>>> text "VJ Rada can transfer all assets in this contract to emself
> >>by
> >>> >>>> announcement".
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Ned Strange <
> >>> edwardostra...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>> > I intend to amend the contract called "Hi", without objection.
> >>The
> >>> new
> >>> >>>> > text of that contract would state "VJ Rada can remove all
> >>assets
> >>> from
> >>> >>>> > this contract by announcement".
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > --
> >>> >>>> > From V.J. Rada
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> --
> >>> >>>> From V.J. Rada
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> From V.J. Rada
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > From V.J. Rada
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> From V.J. Rada
> >>>
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>


-- 

~Corona

Reply via email to