Given my imminent return, if it is possible to do so, I flip my master
switch to myself.
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 19:29 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just saw this thread and wanted to mention that as the summer rolls
> around, I may return.
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 19:08 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOO
>>
>> though I think the software we're using was actually a MUD:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUD
>>
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>>
>> > What's MOO?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 12:45 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > It wouldn't work over email, but this conversation also had me
>> wondering
>> > > whether the MOO and its final state lived on a disk anywhere!
>> > >
>> > > The rules and the MOO structure (rooms and programming) were very
>> > > intertwined,
>> > > e.g. the rules assume a MOO-programmed-solution for voting and all
>> other
>> > > interactions.  IMO it wouldn't be worth the effort even as a gimmick
>> UNLESS
>> > > the MOO was actually brought online.  It wouldn't be worth the effort
>> > > of porting to a mailing list because that's already been done - and
>> that's
>> > > Agora.  In a way, moving to the mailing list freed Agorans from their
>> > > "physical restrictions" and allowed them to be platonic idealists they
>> > > wanted to be, so Agora is more an evolution of that spirit and the MOO
>> > > would be an archaic step backward (though as you say it would be fun
>> to
>> > > revisit as a novelty).
>> > >
>> > > We had a brief fling with a new MOO circa 2004-2005, and it was
>> abandoned
>> > > fairly quickly probably in part because it was restrictive like that.
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 25 May 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>> > > > It would definitely strip it of a lot of its former "spirit"
>> although
>> > > isn't
>> > > > nomic about change in the first place?
>> > > >
>> > > > But yeah, it more about the formal gimmick. Not "reviving" the
>> spirit of
>> > > > Nomic World itself.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Alex Smith <
>> ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 18:07 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>> > > > > > OH MAN.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > What if we managed to "hack" the defunct NW via FRC, to then
>> pull it
>> > > > > into a
>> > > > > > better place (like a mailing list or Discord server) so that it
>> can
>> > > be
>> > > > > > played again?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Does anyone have FRC's old rules? How difficult could it be?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Nomic World on a mailing list would defeat the entire point of it
>> being
>> > > > > Nomic World. (You'd also quickly discover that most of the rules
>> > > > > wouldn't work in that context.)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > There's a reason that Agora started as its own nomic.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > ais523
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to