On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 18:01 +0200, Corona wrote: > This report is intentionally false, with the sole deviation from > reality being re-ratifying the items generated > in facilities on June 4, which have been accidentaly ratified out of > existence by the last report.
CFJ: In the above-quoted message, Corona published a self-ratifying report. Arguments: Precedent says that a disclaimer stating that the content of a message is false is enough to prevent it taking actions by announcement. Is the same true of self-ratifying reports? See CFJs 1971 (particularly relevant), 2069, 2830, 3000 for more information. (Information about these CFJs is available at <https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/>). -- ais523
