I CFJ (barring Aris) this statement: “G.’s attempt in the message quoted below to transfer coins to the contract between em and D. Margaux is EFFECTIVE.” (I note for the Arbitor’s benefit that G. is an interested party. Also twg might be considered an interested party because this transfer circumvents the “according to eir means” proposals that e authored.)
(This should raise exactly the same issues as the CFJ that I just raised in my most recent message, but just in case.) On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > I transfer 400 coins to the Contract that I most recently publicly > agreed to. > > [Yes, I am aware of the current text of R2483.] > > If I have voted on any of the below-indicated proposals, I > retract those votes. > > If Gaelan has voted on any of the below-indicated proposals, I > act on behalf of Gaelan to retract those votes. > > > I vote as follows, and act on behalf of Gaelan to vote as follows: > > > 8077B* twg 3.0 Patchy McPatchface > FOR > > > 8078B* twg 2.0 From each according to eir means > AGAINST > > > 8079B* twg 2.0 From each according to eir means v2 > AGAINST > > > 8080B* Aris, twg 2.0 From each according to eir means v3 > Conditional: If G. successfully transferred at least 1 coin to a > contract in this message, AGAINST, otherwise FOR. > > > 8081B* Aris, G., twg 3.0 Point Installation Act v2 > Conditional: If G. successfully transferred at least 1 coin to a > contract in this message, AGAINST, otherwise FOR. > > > 8082A* twg 1.0 Gamestate correction for July 2018 > FOR > > > 8083A* G. 3.0 quorum fixes > FOR > > > 8084A* Trigon 1.0 Needs more Competition > AGAINST > > > 8085A* Kenyon, twg 1.0 Plain Old Bribery, Mk. II > FOR > > > 8087A* Aris 1.0 Even Freer Proposals v2 > AGAINST > > > 8088A* Kenyon, twg 1.0 Return of the Zombie Loopholes > PRESENT > > > 8089A* Trigon, [1] 1.0 Revamping movement v3.2 > PRESENT > > >
