D. Margaux wrote:

Fair enough. This is CFJ 3678. I assign it to Murphy.

On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:22 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:

I CFJ “By sending a message at 3:35 PM Pacific on October 27, G.
performed
one or more regulated actions.”

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 27, 2018 10:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <
ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:



Interpreting the somewhat informal date/time spec as "on or about
3:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time (-0700) on October 27, 2018"
(presumably caller's intent, and if not then e can submit another):

The only public message from G. that meets this spec is the one
quoted by the caller (archive link in evidence). To the best of my
knowledge, it was genuinely an empty message (unregulated), and
neither that message nor any non-public message e may have sent
around the same time triggered any non-obvious recordkeeping duties or
the like. As usual, if evidence to the contrary later emerges (e.g. a
relevant encrypted contract is revealed), then this judgement should be
appealed accordingly.

FALSE.

Evidence:

https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-October/039429.html


Reply via email to