Ttttpf
> On Nov 11, 2018, at 9:38 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>
> Votes inline
>
>> On Nov 11, 2018, at 7:34 PM, Aris Merchant
>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
>> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
>> quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
>> options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
>> conditional votes).
>>
>> ID Author(s) AI Title
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence
> FOR
>> 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed
> FOR
>> 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing
> FOR
>> 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs
> FOR
>> 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards
> AGAINST because unconditional income is a good thing.
>> 8128 twg 2.0 [1]
> AGAINST—this is just Speaker and Distributor, right? Both seem like they are
> worthy of a stipend.
>> 8129 twg, Trigon, G. 3.0 Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2
> FOR
>> 8130 Gaelan 2.0 Law is Ambiguous Word Act
> FOR
>> 8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act
> AGAINST, this is already handled by 2552/0¶1.
>> 8132 Aris 1.0 Website Ruleset Update Petition
> FALSE
>>
>>
>> [1] With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies
>>
>> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8123
>> Title: Independence
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author: Gaelan
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> Prepend “Such an action is known as a dependent action.” to the
>> beginning of the last paragraph of rule 1728, “Dependent Actions.”
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8124
>> Title: Only proposals should be distributed
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: Trigon
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> [ COMMENT: This was pretty useless back in the day and it still is. If
>> someone decides they need this mechanic for anything, just reenact
>> it. ]
>>
>> Repeal Rule 2515 "Distributing Assets".
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8125
>> Title: Time periods are confusing
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author: Trigon
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> [ COMMENT: The current way is a really roundabout way of doing it, in my
>> opinion. I'm not sure if this is any better, to be honest, but
>> I think it has some merit. ]
>>
>> Amend Rule 1728 "Dependent Actions" by:
>> replacing the following:
>> 2. If the action is to be performed Without N Objections, With N
>> Agoran Consent, or With Notice, if the intent was announced at
>> least 4 days earlier
>>
>> 3. If the action is to be performed With T Notice, if the intent
>> was announced at least T earlier.
>> with:
>> 2. The intent was announced at least T earlier. If T is undefined,
>> it is instead considered to be 4 days if the action is not With
>> N Support; otherwise 0 days.
>>
>> and by renumbering the list accordingly.
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8126
>> Title: High-level asset verbs
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author: Trigon
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> [ COMMENT: This terminology is ripped from the coins rule and applies to
>> all assets. I really like this one. ]
>>
>> Amend Rule 2577 "Asset Actions" by replacing the second paragraph with
>> the following three paragraphs:
>> For an entity to earn an asset is for that asset to be created in
>> that entity's possession. To grant an entity an asset is to create
>> it in eir possession.
>>
>> For an entity to lose an asset is for that asset to be destroyed
>> from that entity's possession. To revoke an asset from an entity
>> is to destroy it from that entity's possession.
>>
>> For entity A to take an asset from entity B is to transfer it from
>> entity B to entity A.
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2559 "Paydays" by replacing its text with:
>> Whenever a Payday occurs, the following events happen in order:
>>
>> 1. Each player first earns 10 coins; then
>>
>> 2. For each office, if a single player held that office for 16 or
>> more days in the previous month and no unforgivable fines were
>> levied on em for eir conduct in that office during that time,
>> that player earns 5 coins.
>>
>> The occurrence of Paydays is secured. At the beginning of each
>> month, a Payday occurs.
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2499 "Welcome Packages" by replacing its text with:
>> If a player has not received a Welcome Package since e most
>> recently registered, any player CAN cause em to receive one by
>> announcement.
>>
>> When a player receives a Welcome Package, e earns 10 coins.
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2555 "Blots" by replacing the paragraph beginning "To Lefy a
>> Fine" with:
>> To Levy a Fine of N on a person, where N is a positive integer, is
>> to grant em N blots. To expunge a blot is to destroy it.
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2583 "Earning Coins" by deleting the paragraph beginning "For
>> a player to".
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8127
>> Title: Reinstituting Rewards
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author: Trigon
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> [ COMMENT: For those of you who know that I really liked the rewards
>> system from last year, this shouldn't come as a surprise. Now that
>> there's no minigame, I think we should have a constant source for
>> earning coins, so how about we tie it to general participation in the
>> game? ]
>>
>> Repeal Rule 2583 "Earning Coins"
>>
>> Reenact Rule 2496 "Rewards" and replace its text with:
>> A player CAN earn the set of assets associated with a reward
>> condition exactly once in a timely fashion each time e fulfills it
>> by stating how many assets e earns as a result of this action.
>>
>> Below is a list of reward conditions and their associated assets.
>>
>> * Being the author of an adopted proposal: a number of coins equal
>> to ((the total strength of all valid ballots cast FOR the
>> decision - the total strength of all valid ballots cast AGAINST)
>> times the adoption index of the result) rounded up.
>>
>> * Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to: 5 coins.
>>
>> * Publishing a duty-fulfilling report: 5 coins. This reward can
>> only be claimed once per office per week for a weekly report and
>> once per office per month for a monthly report.
>>
>> * Having a Thesis pass peer-review and be granted a Degree based
>> on its merit: 20 shinies
>>
>>
>> If a proposal by Trigon has not passed in the same distribution as this
>> proposal entitled "High-level asset verbs", amend rule 2496 by replacing
>> all instances of the word "earn" with "create in eir possession".
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8128
>> Title: With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies
>> Adoption index: 2.0
>> Author: Trigon
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> Amend rule 2559, "Paydays", by changing the text "For each office" to
>> "For each office that has official duties".
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8129
>> Title: Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author: twg
>> Co-authors: Trigon, G.
>>
>> Amend Rule 2166, "Assets", by appending the following paragraph to it:
>>
>> For a class of assets to be "tracked by" an entity is for that
>> entity to be its recordkeepor.
>>
>> For the purposes of this proposal, the "Authoritative Document" is the
>> document that as of the resolution of the most recent Agoran Decision
>> to adopt this proposal:
>> (a) is a portion of the Treasuror's weekly report;
>> (b) is a list of all instances of coins and their owners;
>> (c) has been continuously undoubted for at least one week; and
>> (d) is the most recently published document that satisfies each of
>> criteria (a), (b) and (c).
>>
>> Ratify the Authoritative Document. Designate this ratification a
>> convergence.
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8130
>> Title: Law is Ambiguous Word Act
>> Adoption index: 2.0
>> Author: Trigon
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2531 (Referee Accountability) by replacing “law” with “the rules."
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8131
>> Title: V.J. Rada Protection Act
>> Adoption index: 2.0
>> Author: 天火狐
>> Co-authors: twg
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 1885, "Zombie Auctions", by appending the following as a
>> new paragraph:
>>
>> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, if a player's master
>> switch is flipped while a zombie auction in which e is a lot
>> is ongoing, then the winner of that lot NEED NOT pay Agora eir
>> bid and Agora CANNOT and NEED NOT transfer the contents of the
>> lot to the winner.
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8132
>> Title: Website Ruleset Update Petition
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: Aris
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> WHEREAS the FLR is the most complete record of Agora's rules;
>> WHEREAS the copy of the Ruleset posted on the Agoran website is thus a form
>> of the FLR;
>> WHEREAS Players, Observers, and Other Interested Parties go to Agora's
>> website
>> for the most accurate and current information about the rules;
>> WHEREAS the FLR is only updated once a month; and
>> WHEREAS, given that the Rulesets are generated programmatically,
>> it would impose little additional strain on the Rulekeepor to update
>> the version of the FLR posted on the website each time e releases an
>> SLR (i.e. once a week);
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it is THE WILL OF AGORA that the
>> Honorable
>> Rulekeepor update the main ruleset linked from the Agoran website each time
>> e releases an SLR, and that e additionally post a copy of the official FLR
>> on the website.
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
