Well spotted. I retract the proposal "Rephrasing Rewards". -twg
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, November 23, 2018 10:41 PM, Aris Merchant <[email protected]> wrote: > Wait, you want the literal opposite of this right? You want to switch it > back to “earn”. The problem is that the provision did trigger, and it > shouldn't have. I submit the following proposal: > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > Title: Uncorrecting Rewards > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: twg, Trigon > > [ > This is A.I. 3.0 because I don't know what Rule 2496's power is. > Proposal 8127 "reenacted" it, meaning it acquires the power it had > when it was originally repealed, but I wasn't around when that > happened and it's not in the SLR yet. > ] > > Amend rule 2496 by replacing all instances of the text "create in eir > possession" with the word > "earn". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > -Aris > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 1:43 PM Timon Walshe-Grey [email protected] wrote: > > > You are, of course, correct. > > I submit this proposal: > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > ID: 8127 > > Title: Rephrasing Rewards > > Adoption index: 3.0 > > Author: twg > > Co-authors: Trigon > > [ > > This is A.I. 3.0 because I don't know what Rule 2496's power is. > > Proposal 8127 "reenacted" it, meaning it acquires the power it had > > when it was originally repealed, but I wasn't around when that > > happened and it's not in the SLR yet. > > ] > > Amend rule 2496 by replacing all instances of the word "earn" with > > "create in eir possession". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > Notice of Honour: > > -1 twg (allowing eir own moneymaking activities to interfere with the rest > > of the game) > > +1 Trigon (suffering eir proposal being mangled by aforementioned > > activities) > > (I'm virtually certain my "rewards" do work, but I'm astonished nobody's > > CFJed them on principle yet...) > > -twg > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 3:19 AM, Ørjan Johansen [email protected] > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > > > > > I resolve the Agoran Decisions to adopt each of Proposals 8129, 8131, > > > > 8127, 8123-8126, 8128, 8130 and 8132, in that order, as follows. > > > > > > Fiendish. (Assuming this works. People might want to CFJ your double > > > earnings.) However, I think resolving 8127 before 8126 has another > > > unfortunate side effect, it causes the last paragraph of 8127 to trigger: > > > > > > > If a proposal by Trigon has not passed in the same distribution as this > > > > proposal entitled "High-level asset verbs", amend rule 2496 by > > > > replacing > > > > > > > all instances of the word "earn" with "create in eir possession". > > > > > > Greetings, > > > Ørjan.
