For each player, I point my finger at that player for failing to reenact rule 2452 (“Trust Tokens”) with the same ID number and the next change identifier, in violation of rule 105.
Gaelan > On Feb 9, 2019, at 9:51 PM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > First off, NttPF. > > On 2/9/19 10:09 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: >>> 8161 Trigon, Ørjan 3.0 Extend "amend" and “reenact” >> AGAINST, because “A repealed rule not in the ruleset identified by its most >> recent rule number MUST be specified for reenactment” could be interpreted >> as imposing an obligation to reenact rules. (Why have an office to randomly >> reenact ONE rule when we can make EVERYONE reenact EVERY rule?) > > If this creates an obligation to reenact rules, the current version is even > worse since it creates an obligation to reenact rules with the same ID number > and the next change identifier. > > -- > Trigon
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
