I assign this CFJ to Trigon. CFJ number forthcoming, when I publish the Arbitor report.
> On Feb 14, 2019, at 8:32 AM, James Cook <jc...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > > I submit a CFJ, specifying: > > "Agora is not Satisfied with an intent to perform an action unless it > is to be performed With Notice or With T Notice. In particular, > Gaelan's recent attempt to Declare Apathy on February 7, 2019 was > ineffective, and D. Margaux's dependent actions in their recent > message that starts 'I thought for sure people would object...' were > ineffective." > > See below for my evidence, argument, and a proposal to fix it. If it's > judged true, I encourage others to consider that other recent > dependent actions may not have been effective. > > As evidence, I quote Rule 2124: > > # Agora is Satisfied with an intent to perform a specific action if > # and only if: > # > # 1. if the action is to be performed Without N Objections, then it > # has fewer than N objectors; > # > # 2. if the action is to be performed With N support, then it has > # N or more supporters; and > # > # 3. if the action is to be performed with N Agoran Consent, then > # the ratio of supporters to objectors is greater than N, or the > # action has at least one supporter and no objectors. > # > # 4. if the action is to be performed With Notice or With T Notice. > > Here is my argument: Number 4 in that list doesn't have any word to > link it to other items in the list (like the "and" between 2 and 3), > but the only reasonable interpretation is that it's an additional > condition that needs to be satisfied. > > I submit a proposal as follows. > Title: Correction to Agoran Satisfaction > Adoption Index: 2 > Text: > Amend Rule 2124 by deleting the text "4. if the action is to be > performed With Notice or With T Notice.".
