I understand your concerns fellow players but I believe that a good sensible solution would be to something like something something text here. Anyways, I intend to declare victory by apathy for myself.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 9:44 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 17, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > > Gaelan had to specifically ask me to remove my > > standard intent boilerplate, otherwise eir scam would have been trivially > > stopped > > But Gaelan’s scam did identify a dangerous flaw in the intent rules. Would > you have noticed it and objected in time if, instead, e had intended > without objection to ratify a document that, e.g., gave everyone 50 blots?
