Votes inline. An apology in advance to Aris—I’m not a huge fan of your
“administrative” proposals. I’ll try and articulate why in the next few days,
but I think it’s just a difference in vision. Please don’t take it personally;
they’re well-written proposals. I do recognize the need for quicker resolution
to “day-one” bugs, but I think there’s a lot of interesting gameplay there and
this runs the risk of making things *too* simple. I’ll think more about ways to
speed that up while keeping it interesting.
Gaelan
> On Jan 20, 2020, at 7:22 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official
> <agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
> options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
> conditional votes).
>
> ID Author(s) AI Title
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8287 twg 2.0 Blot Stabilisation
PRESENT: This means unpopular fugitives have no way to lose blots. Maybe that’s
OK?
> 8288 omd 1.0 Glitteral
ENDORSE Treasuror
> 8289 Alexis 1.0 You're Banned from the Theater
AGAINST
> 8290 G. 3.0 More Headroom
FOR, although I might write up my own take on this at some point.
> 8291 Bernie, [1] 3.0 Interesting Chambers v3.1
FOR. I am a bit worried about the opening bracket at the beginning of the
proposal, given the common usage of that character for comments in proposals.
> 8292 Bernie, twg 3.0 Self-Ratification Simplification Act
PRESENT, because this seems dangerous and is over my head.
> 8293 Bernie, twg 1.0 CFJ Bait
ENDORSE the Arbitor, in case e feels CFJ load is too high.
> 8294 Bernie, twg 3.0 Authorial Intent
AGAINST. Among other things, this benefits authors of proposals who sneak in
questionably-functional scams.
> 8295 Bernie, twg, Alexis 3.0 Rewards Reform Act
FOR
> 8296 Aris, G. 1.0 Divergence
FOR, although I’m a little sad to see my mechanism go.
> 8297 Aris 2.1 Imminent Failure
FOR
> 8298 Aris, [2] 2.0 Administrative Adjudication v3
AGAINST. Sorry—I just don’t like it for some reason. I’ll think about it over
the next few days and see if I can articulate why better.
> 8299 Aris, G. 3.0 The Reset Button v2
AGAINST—I’m worried that codifying an “easy way out” like this will remove a
lot of the interest in cleaning up situations like this. Maybe it’s just me,
but that’s a part of the game that I enjoy.
> 8300 Aris 3.0 Patches
AGAINST. This scares me—it’s a brand-new, completely untested mechanism for
power-3 rule changes. The objection count also seems high to me; RwO, which is
less powerful, is without objection.
> 8301 Aris, Jason Cobb 3.0 Consolidated Regulatory Recordkeeping v2
FOR
> 8302 Aris 1.5 Generic Petitions
FOR, but I do feel like “discretionary power” deserves a definition.
> 8303 Aris, [3] 3.0 Contract Patency v3
PRESENT pending a final scam-check read, but almost certainly eventually FOR.
> 8304 Bernie, twg, Jason Cobb 3.0 Rewards Reform Act - v1.1 Patch
FOR
> 8305 Alexis 3.0 Keeping Up With the Times
CONDITIONAL: AGAINST if G's votes resolves to AGAINST, otherwise PRESENT. Quite
frankly, I always thought of the terms as gender-neutral anyway.
> 8306 Gaelan 3.0 Deregistration
AGAINST
> 8307 D. Margaux 3.0 Deregistration
AGAINST
>
> The proposal pool is currently empty.
>
> [1] Trigon, Aris, Gaelan, G., Jason Cobb, twg
> [2] Gaelan, twg, G., Jason Cobb, Alexis
> [3] Gaelan, Jason Cobb, Falsifian
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.
>
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8287
> Title: Blot Stabilisation
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: twg
> Co-authors:
>
>
> /* Now that people can expunge each others' blots when they feel
> * an appropriate sentence has been served, blots don't tend to
> * stick around for more than a month or two, so there's not much
> * value in the quarterly blot decay.
> */
>
> Amend Rule 2555, "Blots", by deleting the following paragraph:
>
> At the beginning of each quarter, half (rounded down) of each
> fugitive's blots are destroyed.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8288
> Title: Glitteral
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: omd
> Co-authors:
>
> Amend Rule 2602 (Glitter) to read:
>
> Each time a player earns a type of Ribbon while already owning
> that type of Ribbon, e CAN, once within the next 7 days, claim a
> consolation prize by announcement. Claiming a consolation prize
> causes em to earn N+1 coins, where N is the number of players
> that do not own the same type of Ribbon.
>
> [Tried to make it as clear as possible without being excessively
> verbose. I split it into two sentences because the change in timing
> of the antecedent would otherwise create ambiguity about when "N+1"
> should be evaluated.]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8289
> Title: You're Banned from the Theater
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
>
> Repeal Rule 2602 (Glitter).
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8290
> Title: More Headroom
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: G.
> Co-authors:
>
> [I went and looked - when we inflated base voting power from 1 to 3,
> we kept the range 0-5, so we really deflated the range. Going with
> 14, a little less than before].
>
> Amend Rule 2422 (Voting Strength) by replacing:
> The voting strength of an entity on an Agoran decision is an
> integer between 0 and 5 inclusive
> with:
> The voting strength of an entity on an Agoran decision is an
> integer between 0 and 14 inclusive
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8291
> Title: Interesting Chambers v3.1
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Bernie
> Co-authors: Trigon, Aris, Gaelan, G., Jason Cobb, twg
>
> [Enact a new Rule of Power 2.0, entitled "Ministries", with the following
> text:
>
> A Ministry is an entity defined as such by this rule. Each
> Ministry has a goal. The Ministries of Agora, and their goals, are
> as follows:
>
> A. Ministry of Justice: serve justice to rulebreakers
> B. Ministry of Efficiency: see official duties performed swiftly
> C. Ministry of Legislation: see votes cast on proposals
> D. Ministry of Participation: reward players for achievements
> E. Ministry of Economy: encourage economic activity and contracts
>
> Interest is an office switch, tracked by the ADoP, whose possible
> values are lists of ministries, defaulting to the empty list. The
> ADoP CAN flip an office's interest without objection.
>
> For each item of each office's interest, that office's holder's
> voting strength is increased by 2 on proposals whose chamber is
> set to that ministry.
>
>
> Enact a new Rule of Power 2.0, entitled "Proposal Classes", with the
> following text:
>
> Proposals created since the enactment of this rule have an
> untracked Class switch with possible values ordinary (the default)
> and democratic.
>
> When a proposal with an adoption index greater than 2.0 is
> created, its class becomes democratic.
>
> Any player CAN, with 2 Agoran consent, flip an ordinary proposal's
> class to democratic, provided that it is in the Proposal Pool or
> that there is an Agoran decision on its adoption whose voting
> period has not yet ended.
>
>
> Enact a new Rule of Power 2.0, entitled "Proposal Chambers", with the
> following text:
>
> Chamber is an untracked ordinary proposal switch whose possible
> values include unset (the default) and each of the ministries of
> Agora.
>
> A proposal's chamber SHOULD only be decided by which ministry's
> goals it effects to the greatest degree.
>
> Any player CAN, with 2 Agoran consent, flip the chamber of an
> ordinary proposal to any ministry, provided that it is in the
> Proposal Pool or that there is an Agoran decision on its adoption
> whose voting period has not yet ended.
>
>
> Amend Rule 1607, "Distribution", by changing "the text, author, and
> coauthors of the proposal" to "the text, author, coauthors, class and
> (if applicable) chamber of the proposal".
>
>
> Amend Rule 2350, "Proposals", by adding the following to the list:
>
> * A chamber to which the proposal shall be assigned upon its
> creation.
>
>
> Amend Rule 2422, "Voting Strength", by changing "between 0 and 5" to
> "between 0 and 15".
>
>
> // Move the PM's casting vote to the Speaker, since the PM already gets
> // all ministries:
>
> Amend Rule 2423, "First Among Equals", by removing the second paragraph.
>
> Amend Rule 103, "The Speaker", by changing "For an election of the Prime
> Minister, the Speaker" to "The Speaker".
>
>
> Set the ADoP's Interest to [Efficiency].
> Set the Arbitor's Interest to [Justice].
> Set the Assessor's Interest to [Efficiency, Legislation].
> Set the Herald's Interest to [Participation].
> Set the Prime Minister's Interest to [Justice, Efficiency, Legislation,
> Participation, Economy].
> Set the Promotor's Interest to [Legislation].
> Set the Referee's Interest to [Justice].
> Set the Registrar's Interest to [Efficiency].
> Set the Rulekeepor's Interest to [Legislation, Participation].
> Set the Tailor's Interest to [Participation].
> Set the Treasuror's Interest to [Economy, Economy].
>
> // Some of the above have been slightly rejigged given the new
> // definition of Participation
>
> /* Treasuror is given Economy twice for balance reasons:
> * - It is a high-complexity office (was given Complexity=3 under
> * Politics), like Assessor and Rulekeepor; this makes the power
> * commensurate to the importance, and there is no ministry it really
> * fits under besides Economy
> * - It bumps up the number of voting increases issued for Economy
> * proposals; all other ministries have 2-3 excluding the PM.
> * Not just trying to give myself votes, I swear :P
> */
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8292
> Title: Self-Ratification Simplification Act
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Bernie
> Co-authors: twg
>
> /* I don't recall any instances in modern times where a CFJ has been
> * used to explicitly doubt a document, and the behaviour is
> * replicable by citations anyway. So let's get rid of it, as it makes
> * R2201 significantly longer and also gives it two lists with the
> * same numbering scheme (always a headache).
> * This also clarifies that non-players are able to issue CoEs - this
> * was already possible (and may be useful as a protection against
> * accidental deregistrations from incorrect Registrar reports) but
> * was a bit non-obvious.
> */
>
> Amend Rule 2201, "Self-Ratification", by replacing its text from
> "A doubt is" to "cites the claim of error:" (inclusive) with the
> following:
>
> Any person CAN by announcement issue a doubt (syn. claim of
> error), identifying a document and explaining the scope and nature
> of a perceived error in it (or in a statement it attests to).
>
> When this happens, the publisher of the original document SHALL
> (if e was required to publish that document) or SHOULD (otherwise)
> do one of the following in a timely fashion, in an announcement
> that clearly cites the claim of error:
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8293
> Title: CFJ Bait
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Bernie
> Co-authors: twg
>
> I register as a player.
>
> I receive a Welcome Package.
>
> I grant myself 9 coins.
>
> I transfer 2 coins to Agora.
> I transfer 2 coins to Proposal 8777.
> I transfer 2 coins to Trigon.
> I transfer 2 coins to the Lost and Found Department.
>
> Notice of Honour:
> +1 G. (giving twg the inspiration for my creation)
> -1 nch (e's vanished, e doesn't need it)
>
> I vote PRESENT on each Agoran decision whose voting is ongoing.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8294
> Title: Authorial Intent
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Bernie
> Co-authors: twg
>
> // Not actually expecting this to pass, at least not on first reading,
> // but hopefully it will provoke some discussion.
>
> Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
> intent," after "past judgements,".
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8295
> Title: Rewards Reform Act
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Bernie
> Co-authors: twg, Alexis
>
> /* 1. Changes rewards to be issued by relevant officers (mostly ADoP,
> * Arbitor) in their weekly reports, instead of calculated and
> * claimed by individual players themselves.
> * 2. Effectively converts Glitter into a reward issued by the Tailor.
> * (Players must still claim their Glitter by announcement, but the
> * Tailor calculates the coin amounts and awards them all in
> * weekly batches.)
> * 3. Makes all Ribbons (except White, Gray, Black) eligible for
> * Glitter.
> */
>
> Amend Rule 2496 ("Rewards") as follows:
>
> Replace its first two paragraphs with the following:
>
> Each time a player fulfills a reward condition, the officer
> associated with the condition CAN once, and SHALL before the end
> of the next Agoran week, grant the associated set of assets to the
> player.
>
> Below is a list of reward conditions and their associated assets
> and officers.
>
> Append "(Assessor)" to the first list item.
>
> Append "(Arbitor)" to the second list item.
>
> Append "(ADoP)" to the third list item.
>
> Append "(ADoP)" to the fourth list item.
>
> Append "(Herald)" to the fifth list item.
>
>
> Amend Rule 2438 ("Ribbons") as follows:
>
> Replace the paragraph starting "While a person qualifies..." with
> the following:
>
> A person qualifies for a type of Ribbon if e has earned that type
> of Ribbon within the preceding 7 days (including earlier in the
> same message).
>
> [Removed the Gray and Transparent rephrasings as they were
> unnecessarily confusing and had minimal effect.]
>
> Move the list item starting "Emerald" so that it falls between the
> list items starting "Green" and "Cyan". [This was bothering me.]
>
> Append the following:
>
> While a person qualifies for a type of Ribbon:
>
> - If e has not owned that type of Ribbon within the preceding 7
> days, any player CAN, by announcement, award em that type of
> Ribbon.
>
> - Otherwise, if e has not been awarded that type of Ribbon or
> the corresponding type of Glitter since e last earned or
> came to qualify for that type of Ribbon, e CAN, by
> announcement, award emself that type of Glitter.
>
> Amend Rule 2602 ("Glitter") to read:
>
> For each type of Ribbon, there is a type of Glitter with the same
> name. An attempt to award Glitter is INEFFECTIVE if the type of
> Glitter is not specified.
>
> Each time a player is awarded a type of Glitter, the Tailor CAN
> once, and SHALL before the end of the next Agoran week, grant the
> player N+1 coins, where N is the number of players who did not
> own the corresponding type of Ribbon at the time of the award.
>
> [If the mechanics of the change are approved, R2602 could later be
> further simplified by merging the first para into 2438 and the
> second into R2496]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8296
> Title: Divergence
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-author(s): G.
>
> Amend Rule 2143, "Official Reports and Duties", by removing the paragraph:
>
> A convergence is any change to the gamestate that has, in
> accordance with the rules, been designated as such. A change to
> the gamestate SHOULD NOT be designated as a convergence unless it
> is designed to resolve gamestate ambiguity. Designating a change
> as a convergence is secured; any player CAN do so with 3 Agoran
> Consent. When officeholders provide historical information, they
> NEED NOT accurately document the changes made by the convergence
> or related ambiguities, provided that they instead note that the
> convergence occurred. Information about a convergence (but not the
> resulting state) is inherently uncertain and is thus excluded from
> self-ratification.
>
> Amend Rule 1681, "The Logical Rulesets", by changing the text
> "Whenever a rule is changed in any way, the Rulekeepor SHALL record
> a historical annotation to the rule indicating:"
> to read
> "Whenever a rule is changed in any way, the Rulekeepor SHALL record and
> thereafter maintain a reasonably accurate historical annotation to the
> rule indicating:"
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8297
> Title: Imminent Failure
> Adoption index: 2.1
> Author: Aris
> Co-author(s):
>
> [This is no longer effective; a replacement would be complex to implement
> and probably not worth it.]
>
> Amend Rule 2481, "Festival Restrictions", by removing the list item
>
> "2. Non-Festive players cannot flip the Imminence of any proposal;"
>
> and renumbering the list accordingly.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8298m
> Title: Administrative Adjudication v3
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: Gaelan, twg, G., Jason Cobb, Alexis
>
>
> Enact a new rule, with power 2.0, entitled "Memoranda", with the following
> text:
>
> Each officer CAN, by announcement, issue a memorandum, consisting of a
> specified public document. The memorandum is binding as precedent within
> the officer's official domain, broadly construed, and SHOULD be tracked along
> with judicial cases. An officer SHALL only issue a memorandum to clear up
> a matter of urgent concern creating confusion in eir domain;
> officers are ENCOURAGED to exercise discretion in issuing memoranda.
>
> [Suggested domains of current offices:
> ADoP - Officer elections, whether reports were published, who holds what
> office
> Arbitor - The existence and assignment of CFJs, but not their resolution
> Assessor - Votes, resolutions
> Comptrollor - Vetos
> Distributor - The operation of the lists
> Herald - Patent titles, honour, the birthday tournament
> Notary (if passed) - Contracts and pledges
> Prime Minister - Anything in the jurisdiction of multiple officers
> Promotor - Proposals in the pool, distributions
> Referee - Fines and criminal law in general
> Registrar - Registration & deregistration, zombie auctions, etc.
> Rulekeepor - The state of the rules (e.g. whether proposals worked)
> Speaker - Head of State stuff (i.e. nothing)
> Tailor - Ribbons
> Treasuror - Assets
> ]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8299
> Title: The Reset Button v2
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: G.
>
> If no proposal whose title contains the text "Administrative Adjudication"
> has passed within the last 30 days, the remainder of this proposal has no
> effect.
>
> Create the following power 3.0 rule entitled "The Reset Button":
>
> An officer CAN, without 3 objections, pursuant to a memorandum finding it
> in the best interests of the game, issue an adjustment, which shall be
> a public document. When the adjustment is issued, all changes that are
> included in the adjustment take effect.
>
> This is a RECOMMENDED method for resetting aspects of the game in a
> fair and equitable manner following the discovery and/or exploitation
> of unintended loopholes within the Rules, whether the exploitation
> was accidental or purposeful.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8300
> Title: Patches
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors:
>
> If no proposal whose title contains the text "Administrative Adjudication"
> has passed within the last 30 days, the remainder of this proposal has no
> effect.
>
> Create the following power 3.0 rule entitled "Patches":
>
> An officer CAN, without 3 objections, pursuant to a memorandum finding it
> in the best interests of the game, issue a regulation known as a patch.
> To the extent the patch is not manifestly abusive, disproportionate, or
> unreasonable, the rules are to be interpreted as if they were modified
> in the manner stipulated by the patch.
>
> Enacting and modifying patches are secured. A patch's promulgator CAN amend
> it without 3 objections. Any person CAN repeal the patch by announcement
> once it has been rendered obsolete.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8301
> Title: Consolidated Regulatory Recordkeeping v2
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: Jason Cobb
>
> [The Rulekeepor is willing to take on this responsibility, and it
> makes considerably more sense than making the officer include a random
> section in their report; instead, it keeps all of the rules and regulations
> together in one easily accessible place.]
>
> Amend Rule 2493, Regulations, by changing the text
>
> "Regulations are tracked in their Promulgator's weekly report."
> to read
> "Regulations are tracked by the Rulekeepor as part of eir
> weekly and monthly reports in a fashion similar to rules."
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8302
> Title: Generic Petitions
> Adoption index: 1.5
> Author: Aris
> Co-author(s):
>
> Amend Rule 649, "Patent Titles", by removing the paragraph:
>
> If a player publicly petitions that the Herald award a patent
> title to another player for a specified reason, the Herald SHALL
> respond in a timely fashion by either attempting to grant an
> appropriate patent title or explaining publicly why no patent
> title is warranted.
>
> Amend Rule 2143, "Official Reports and Duties", by appending as a new
> paragraph
> at the end:
>
> If an office has a discretionary power, and a player publicly petitions
> the officer to apply that power in a specific case or manner, the officer
> SHALL publicly respond in a timely fashion.
>
> [No reason this should be specific to Herald (yes, I know I added it in the
> first place), and it seems like a good convention to have. It could be
> applied to regulations and memoranda, for instance.]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8303
> Title: Contract Patency v3
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: Gaelan, Jason Cobb, Falsifian
>
>
> Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full:
> A person is deemed to have consented to an action if and only if,
> at the time the action took place:
>
> 1. e, acting as emself, has publicly stated that e agrees to the action
> and not subsequently publicly withdrawn eir statement;
> 2. e is party to a contract whose body explicitly and unambiguously
> indicates eir consent; or
> 3. it is reasonably clear from context that e wanted the
> action to take place or assented to it taking place.
>
> Amend Rule 2124, "Agoran Satisfaction", by removing the text '(syn.
> "consent")'.
>
> Amend Rule 1742, "Contracts", to read in full:
>
> Any group of one or more consenting persons (the parties) may
> publicly make an agreement among themselves with the intention that it be
> binding upon them and be governed by the rules. Such an agreement
> is known as a contract. A contract may be modified, including
> by changing the set of parties, with the consent of all
> existing parties. A contract may also be terminated with the
> consent of all parties. A contract automatically terminates if the number of
> parties to it falls below one. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a person to
> become a party to a contract without eir consent.
>
> Parties to a contract governed by the rules SHALL act in
> accordance with that contract. This obligation is not impaired
> by contradiction between the contract and any other contract, or
> between the contract and the rules.
>
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, any change that would cause the full
> provisions or parties of a contract to become publicly unavailable is
> canceled
> and does not take effect.
>
> The portion of a contract's provisions that can be interpreted
> with reference only to information that is either publicly or generally
> available are known as its body; the remainder of the provisions are known
> as the annex.
>
> A party to a contract CAN perform any of the following actions as
> explicitly and unambiguously permitted by the contract's body:
>
> * Act on behalf of another party to the contract.
>
> * By announcement, revoke destructible assets from the contract.
>
> * By announcement, transfer liquid assets from the contract to a specified
> recipient.
>
> Amend rule 2450, "Pledges", by adding at the end of the first paragraph
> "A pledge ceases to exist at the end of its time window."
>
> Destroy every pledge with an expired time window.
>
> Enact a new power 2.0 rule, entitled "The Notary", with the following text:
>
> The Notary is an office.
>
> The Notary's weekly report contains:
>
> 1. every pledge, along with its title, creator, time window, time of
> creation, and time of expiry; and
> 2. every contract, with its title, full provisions, and parties.
>
> If the Notary is required to report a title, but none has been otherwise
> publicly provided, e CAN select one.
>
> The transitional period lasts for at least 90 days after this rule comes
> into force; thereafter, any player CAN end it by announcement.
> A pledge or contract is invisible if it was created before this rule came
> into force, and has not been publicly posted since this rule came into force;
> for a contract, this publication must include its full provisions and list of
> parties, along with a certification or adequate proof of their accuracy and
> completeness. During the transitional period, the Notary NEED NOT report
> any invisible contract or pledge. When the transitional period is ended,
> each invisible contract or pledge ceases to exist in the order they were
> created, and then this rule amends itself by deleting this paragraph.
>
> Make Gaelan the Notary.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8304
> Title: Rewards Reform Act - v1.1 Patch
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Bernie
> Co-authors: twg, Jason Cobb
>
> If the proposal titled "Rewards Reform Act" has not been adopted, this
> proposal has no effect.
>
> Amend Rule 1023, "Agoran Time", by inserting the following top-level
> list item before the one starting "2. Agoran epochs:", and renumbering
> the rest of the list as appropriate:
>
> 2. The phrase "in an officially timely fashion" means "before the
> end of the next Agoran week". This time period is set when the
> requirement is created (i.e. between 7 and 14 days before the
> period ends).
>
> Amend Rule 2496, "Rewards", by replacing "before the end of the next
> Agoran week" with "in an officially timely fashion".
>
> Amend Rule 2602, "Glitter", by replacing "before the end of the next
> Agoran week" with "in an officially timely fashion".
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8305
> Title: Keeping Up With the Times
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 1367 (Degrees) by replacing "Bachelor" with "Baccalaureate" and
> by replacing "Master" with "Magisteriate".
>
> Rename every instance of the Patent Titles "Bachelor of Nomic" and "Master
> of Nomic" accordingly.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8306
> Title: Deregistration
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Gaelan
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Flip the Citizenship of the following players to Unregistered:
> - D. Margaux
> - Baron von Vaderham
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8307
> Title: Deregistration
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: D. Margaux
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Flip the Citizenship of the following player to Unregistered:
> - Gaelan
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
