I favor these. (Unless someone else has a deep desire to tackle them or
Alexis would prefer an additional opinion other than the writer of CFJ
3798; I've actually pondered this issue quite a few times in passing and
never got around to calling a CFJ on it).
On 3/9/2020 4:48 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> I CFJ {I am currently obligated to publish a report detailing the
> values of Karma switches as of some point in the previous Agoran
> week.}
>
> Arguments: I missed my report last week, so my obligation to publish
> it continues. Per CFJ 3798, "each part must be up-to-date to within
> the time frame specified for the report (e.g. to the current week for
> weekly)". So does this mean that I am obligated to publish a report
> for the previous week, as an up-to-date report would not be within the
> specified time frame?
>
> I CFJ {It is generally POSSIBLE, assuming all other conditions for
> deputisation are met, for a person to deputize to publish a weekly
> report by publishing a report accurate as of a date one year prior.}
>
> Arguments: The obligation to continually maintain information in a
> report is one held only by the officer, separate from the obligation
> to actually publish the report. Per CFJ 3798's logic, the obligation
> that the report be up-to-date is a part of the maintenance obligation
> and not of the general publication obligation. It thus follows that a
> completely out-of-date report would still qualify.
>
> Alexis
>
