On the below proposals, I vote as follows: On 6/21/20 3:52 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 8442e G. 1.0 Barrel Barrel Badger Barrel Endorse G. > 8443f G. 2.0 Term Limit PRESENT; seems unseemly to vote on this as PM. > 8444f Aris 2.0 Sedate Officiation AGAINST; this seems less clear, and unnecessary, to me. > 8445* Aris 3.0 Easier Retitling FOR > 8446e G., nch 1.0 Victory Auctions FOR > 8447p CB 1.0 Rule Infancy AGAINST; CANNOT leads to a lot of potential action rewinding. > 8448* Aris, Alexis, Falsifian 3.0 Populist Administration FOR; But 1. seems potentially buggy. I think it should be something more like "A SHALL in the regulation is a SHALL for the officer and a SHOULD for anyone else." That prevents the officer from writing rules for themselves that have implicit SHALLS, since the current wording - to me - implies any statement has the force of a SHALL for the officer. > 8449p Aris, [1] 1.5 Simpler Heraldry FOR if 8448 has been assessed and passed, otherwise AGAINST. > 8450j G. 1.7 CFJ extensions FOR > 8451p CB 1.0 HUMBLE AGORAN FARMER WINS THE GAME AGAINST > 8452j P.S.S., Jason, Trigon 1.0 Indictment Fixes Endorse PSS > 8453p G. 1.0 win indirection FOR > 8454j G., Jason, P.S.S. 2.0 Judicial non-person fixes PRESENT; not sure how I feel about the implication of "former person" > 8455j G., Jason 2.0 old judgements are good judgements FOR > 8456p G. 1.0 namings I vote endorse G. unless G. votes FOR in which case I vote endorse someone who votes AGAINST. If no one does so or this is ambiguous, I vote AGAINST. > 8457f R. Lee, P.S.S. 2.0 CHILL BRO AGAINST; Among being unnecessary, the last clause doesn't imply that they're necessarily the *same* type of asset that was spent.
-- nch Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager
