On 12/7/20 2:19 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote: > =============================== CFJ 3891 =============================== > > In the above statement, ATMunn transferred a coin to Aris. > > ==========================================================================
Gratuitous: The previous currency, shinies, was clearly nondiscrete. You simply had balances that changed during transactions. The current system models individual atomic units of currency changing ownership. If A, B, and C have 0 coins and D has one and they transfer that single coin between each other, it's a single distinguishable asset being moved around. Nothing is being created or destroyed. I see no reason it could not have a unique identifier. Having holdings greater than 1 complicates the pragmatics of tracking, but it still involves moving existing atomic assets between people. That all said, H. Judge should find FALSE in this specific instance because the referent of the transfer is ambiguous due to lack of historical tracking, not due to any theoretical reason.
