On 1/22/21 9:20 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: > But wait, e falsely claimed, with intent to mislead, that the statement was > false with an intent to mislead. > > Gaelan1 Since e pointed out both possibilities, there's no apparent attempt to convince us of any specific interpretation. So there's nothing misleading, regardless of the truth of the overall statement or any parts of it.
-- nix Webmastor, Ministor, Herald
