I favor these CFJs (though lmk if anyone else is really gung-ho to judge them No strong opinions yet - gratuitous arguments welcome.)
On 5/28/2021 5:26 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote: > On 5/27/2021 1:03 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: >> I create the following contract named "Cuddlebeam's Sandwich": >> >> ---------- >> Cuddlebeam is the sole party to this contract. >> >> Layer 1: This is a layer of bread. >> Layer 2: This is a layer of ham. >> Layer 3: This is a layer of bread. >> Layer 4: This is a layer of ham. >> ---------- >> >> I consent to modify the above contract by adding layers for all natural >> numbers, alternating bread and ham, following this example: >> >> Layer 1: This is a layer of bread. >> Layer 2: This is a layer of ham. >> Layer 3: This is a layer of bread. >> Layer 4: This is a layer of ham. >> Layer 5: This is a layer of bread. >> Layer 6: This is a layer of ham. >> etc. >> >> Note that I just need to *consent* to a modification, not spell it out >> entirely. >> > > I CFJ on the following statement: The above amendment to "Cuddlebeam's > Sandwich" was successful. > > I CFJ on the following statement: The contract "Cuddlebeam's Sandwich" > has finite length. > > I request that these two CFJs be linked. >
