On 6/5/2021 2:46 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > I will also say that I am not at all convinced > that this CFJ provides grounds for a win by > paradox. Is this a "a CFJ about the > effectiveness, possibility, or legality of a > change in the gamestate"? I'd guess no, > but that's a CFJ in itself.
Well all right then! CFJ, barring Gaelan: For the purposes of R2553, CFJ 3907 is about the effectiveness, possibility, or legality of a change in the gamestate. (no particular bias on my part/gratuitous arguments welcome)
