oh i derped, reposting
Posting the hash:
{
Scenario A: A player has taken over the economy since April 16 2021 and at
least four days ago.In this scenario, I grant the bearer a victory card. If
I do not have any victory cards, I instead create 3 blots in my possession
and grant the bearer a promise with the text {I grant the bearer a victory
card.}
Scenario B: Either it is at least April 16 2022 and no player has taken
over the economy since April 16 2021, or there is no longer a rules-defined
asset known as a "victory card".In this scenario, I change my vote on one
AI-1 proposal (specified by the bearer) to FOR. I pledge not to change my
vote on that proposal.
}
so!
For each of seventeenMachine, ATMunn, cuddlybanana and Gaelan, I cash their
Promise with the text:
"Cashing conditions: The bearer has published, in the same message, a
document with SHA-256 checksum
598bfa01ada0a41c70471c5873fcc988b7d3006d85fb8c99c2a776e8634e70c4; and
one of the two scenarios described in that document has come true.
I act as described in that document."
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:24 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> oh hey those victory cards I sent into the future have arrived. i hope
> they all made it.
>
> Posting the hash:
>
> {
> Scenario A: A player has taken over the economy since April 16 2021 and at
> least four days ago.In this scenario, I grant the bearer a victory card. If
> I do not have any victory cards, I instead create 3 blots in my possession
> and grant the bearer a promise with the text {I grant the bearer a victory
> card.}
>
> Scenario B: Either it is at least April 16 2022 and no player has taken
> over the economy since April 16 2021, or there is no longer a rules-defined
> asset known as a "victory card".In this scenario, I change my vote on one
> AI-1 proposal (specified by the bearer) to FOR. I pledge not to change my
> vote on that proposal.
> }
>
> so!
>
> For each of seventeenMachine, ATMunn, cuddlybanana and Gaelan cash their
> Promise with the text:
>
> "Cashing conditions: The bearer has published, in the same message, a
> document with SHA-256 checksum
> 598bfa01ada0a41c70471c5873fcc988b7d3006d85fb8c99c2a776e8634e70c4; and
> one of the two scenarios described in that document has come true.
>
> I act as described in that document."
>
