On 6/20/22 17:41, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > On 6/20/22 17:40, Jason Cobb wrote: >> On 6/19/22 18:51, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Rule 2621/9 (Power=1.0) >>>> VP Wins >>>> >>>> If a player has at least 20 more Winsomes than each other player, >>>> e CAN Take Over the Economy by announcement, provided no person >>>> has won the game by doing so in the past 30 days. >>> I agree to the following contract: "Winsome More": >>> 1. G. is the only party to this contract, and can amend or terminate >>> it by announcement. >>> 2. Winsomes are a currency tracked by G. in eir monthly report. >>> 3. G. CAN create, destroy, or transfer Winsomes by announcement. >>> >>> >>> I create 21 Winsomes in my possession. >>> >>> Winsome Report: I have 21, nobody else has any. >>> >>> Comment: >>> >>> There's a bit of ambiguity in these two paragraphs in Rule 1586: >>> A rule, contract, or regulation that refers to an entity by name >>> refers to the entity that had that name when the rule first came >>> to include that reference, even if the entity's name has since >>> changed. >>> >>> If the entity that defines another entity is amended such that it >>> no longer defines the second entity, then the second entity and >>> its attributes cease to exist. >>> >>> Winsomes are no longer "defined" by the rules but they rules do "refer" to >>> Winsomes. If Winsomes have ceased to exist as per the second paragraph, >>> they are no longer entities, and the "reference" bit may or may not apply >>> to *former* entities. "Even if the entity's name has since changed" is >>> very different than "even if the entity no longer exists", and if rules >>> referred to no-longer-existing entities then we'd have to go back a long >>> way into the rules to find terms that were repealed and brought back... >>> >>> -G. >>> >> The above is CFJ 3969. >> >> I assign CFJ 3969 to ais523. >> > Sorry, subject line was wrong. > > This message contains no game actions. >
Okay apparently I'm an idiot and the message never actually called a CFJ, so the assignment failed and ais523 has nothing to judge. -- Jason Cobb Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
