[Just signalling the cfj in the subject line. None of the actions below are re-performed].
On 8/11/2022 11:25 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On 8/11/2022 11:20 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> I agree/consent to the following contract "Auto-Repeal Test": >> --- >> 1. Only G. can join this. >> 2. G. CAN transfer assets from this Contract by announcement; >> on 11-Aug-2022 at 18:22:00 UTC, this line item is removed from this >> contract. >> >> --- >> I transfer 1 coin to the above contract. >> > > > I transfer 1 coin from the above contract to Madrid. > > I call this CFJ: G. transferred 1 coin from a contract to Madrid today. > > > Arguments > > I argue for FALSE. Clause 2 of the contract, allowing me to make the > transfer, was deleted from the contract automatically via a time trigger > before I attempted the transfer. > > This is primarily a test of this part of Rule 1742/23: >> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, any change that would cause >> the full provisions or parties of a contract to become publicly >> unavailable is canceled and does not take effect. > > I argue that the full provisions *were* publicly available by simple and > straightforward inference (of the current time and the published contract) > and so a separate publication wasn't needed to make the contract change. >
