On 10/20/23 08:29, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 6:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-official < > agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> In response to ais523's recent CoE: >>> On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 19:20 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote: >>>> Stone Mossiness Owner Last Wielded Immune? >>>> --------------- --------- --------------- ------------ ------- >>>> Recursion 3 ais523 2023-10-09 >>>> Anti-Equatorial 2 ais523 2023-10-08 >>> [snip] >>>> History: >>>> ======= >>>> 2023-10-09 00:05:26 Mossiness of Blank stone incremented due to >>>> Recursion Stone as Anti-Equatorial Stone. >>>> 2023-10-08 23:59:35 Mossiness of Blank stone incremented due to >>>> Anti-Equatorial Stone. >>> CoE: you increased the mossiness of the wrong stones here (the Anti- >>> Equatorial stone effect increases the mossiness of the wielded stone, >>> not the transferred stone). >> I accept the above CoE and respond to it by publishing the following >> revision: >> >> THE BILLBOARD ROCK CHART (STONEMASON'S WEEKLY REPORT) >> REVISION 1 >> >> Stone Mossiness Owner Last Wielded Immune? >> --------------- --------- --------------- ------------ ------- >> Power 2 Janet 2023-09-17 >> Soul 1 Janet 2023-04-23 >> Sabotage 1 Janet 2023-05-21 >> Minty 1 ais523 2023-10-09 >> Protection 2 ais523 2023-10-01 >> Recursion 3 ais523 2023-10-09 >> Hot Potato 1 ais523 2023-08-27 >> Blank 0 ais523 2023-05-28 >> Anti-Equatorial 3 ais523 2023-10-08 >> Radiance 3 ais523 2023-10-09 >> >> Player Base Rockiness >> ---------------- -------------- >> Beokirby 19 >> juan 13 >> Janet 4 >> ais523 1 >> > CoE: kiako and snail have a Base Rockiness of 1. They both had gardens > dreams at the beginning of a week (the report i missed caused this sorry) > > (Also, does this count as proper reporting if it doesn't say what other > players besides the ones listed have as their base rockiness? I was > expecting to see "All other active players have a base rockiness of 0" in > there.) > -- > snail
The defaults are implied. > 3. Optionally, exactly one office whose holder tracks instances of > that switch. That officer's (weekly, if not specified > otherwise) report includes the value of each instance of that > switch whose value is not its default value; a public document > purporting to be this portion of that officer's report is > self-ratifying, and implies that other instances are at their > default value. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
