On 11/6/23 10:39, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: > On 11/5/23 16:27, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote: >> PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW >> >> If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes: >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing >> >> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, >> and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote >> collector >> is the Assessor, the quorum is 3, the voting method is AI-majority, and the >> valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are >> conditional votes). >> >> >> ID Author(s) AI Title >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> 9020~ 4st, ...[1] 1.0 Free Black Ribbons >> 9021~ 4st, ...[1] 1.0 Free Points >> 9022~ 4st, ...[1] 1.0 Free Pebbles >> 9023~ 4st, ...[1] 1.0 Free Stamps >> 9024~ Janet 1.7 Investigation time limits >> 9025~ Yachay 2.0 Stone Repeal >> 9026~ Janet, Kate 1.5 It's a bit dark in here >> >> >> [1] 4st, snail, juan, kiako, zipzap, Murphy >> >> >> The proposal pool contains the following proposals: >> >> ID Author(s) AI Title >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. >> <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. >> >> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where >> the information shown below differs from the information shown above, >> the information shown above shall control. >> >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 9020 >> Title: Free Black Ribbons >> Adoption Index: 1.0 >> Author: 4st >> Co-author(s): snail, juan, kiako, zipzap, Murphy >> >> >> Grant all players who voted FOR this proposal a black ribbon. >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 9021 >> Title: Free Points >> Adoption Index: 1.0 >> Author: 4st >> Co-author(s): snail, juan, kiako, zipzap, Murphy >> >> >> Grant all players who vote FOR this proposal 50 points. >> (You're welcome Murphy!) >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 9022 >> Title: Free Pebbles >> Adoption Index: 1.0 >> Author: 4st >> Co-author(s): snail, juan, kiako, zipzap, Murphy >> >> >> Enact a new rule entitled "Pebbles", power=1, and the following text: >> { >> A pebble is a stone with smoothness 0, a weekly frequency, and no effect, >> and is uniquely identified by "Pebble of " and a player's name. >> } >> For each player that voted FOR this proposal, create a pebble in their >> possession with their name. >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 9023 >> Title: Free Stamps >> Adoption Index: 1.0 >> Author: 4st >> Co-author(s): snail, juan, kiako, zipzap, Murphy >> >> >> Grant each player that voted FOR this proposal 1 stamp of eir own type. >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 9024 >> Title: Investigation time limits >> Adoption Index: 1.7 >> Author: Janet >> Co-author(s): >> >> >> Amend Rule 2478 by, as a single amendment: >> >> * Replacing "Within 14 days of an infraction being committed," with >> "Within 14 days of an infraction being committed, or if the infraction >> has been noted,". >> >> * Replacing "any other player in the last 7 days" with "any other player >> in the last 14 days". >> >> [Harmonize the time limits to investigate and to note, and ensure a >> noted infraction can always be investigated beyond the time limit to do >> so (allowing deputization).] >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 9025 >> Title: Stone Repeal >> Adoption Index: 2.0 >> Author: Yachay >> Co-author(s): >> >> >> Repeal Rules 2640, 2641, 2642, 2643, 2644, and 2645 in ascending numerical >> order by ID >> >> // Comment: This November, this rule will have existed for three years. >> Tragically, I haven't seen or experienced any interesting gameplay from it. >> I believe it's time to move on. >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 9026 >> Title: It's a bit dark in here >> Adoption Index: 1.5 >> Author: Janet >> Co-author(s): Kate >> >> >> Amend Rule 2656 by, as a single amendment: >> >> * First, prepending the following paragraph: { The Illuminator is an >> office, responsible for tracking radiance. } >> >> * Then, replacing "tracked by the Herald" with "tracked by the Illuminator". >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> -- >> snail > > CoE on the purported distribution of P9026: No such proposal was in the > proposal pool, it was withdrawn at [0] (after all list problems were > resolved). > > CoE on the proposal pool: it is missing the proposal I submitted at [1] > entitled "Fairness in Crime Act". > > > [0]: > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2023-October/052041.html > > [1]: > https://agoranomic.groups.io/g/main/topic/proposal_investigation/102261113 >
Correction: CoE on the purported distribution of Proposal *9024*: No such proposal was in the proposal pool, it was withdrawn at [0] (after all list problems were resolved). -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
