On 11/8/23 16:03, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote: > Referee: > I encourage (not petition) you to look at CFJ 4022 for judgement of the > violation of no faking of these statements. > I am personally of the opinion that this was unnecessary and an abuse of > your office, as trivially, none of these statements are falsy as per that > CFJ.
Abuse of what office? And, that case held two primary things: (1) that "As Referee" merely constituted a factual statement that you were Referee (for the purposes of No Faking), and (2) there was not a preponderance of the evidence that you knew or should have known that "collecting taxes" was not EFFECTIVE. Neither of those holdings is relevant here. You made a series of false statements which are falsy (many of them are nonsense and thus obviously false, so you knew or should have known they were false; the others you likely at least believed to be false), and you made them explicitly under penalty of No Faking. That is sufficient to violate the Rule. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
