On 11/3/25 9:42 AM, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
On 11/3/25 11:02, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-official wrote:
EarlyRetirement judged CFJ 4125 a little over a week ago [1], but
several other people presented additional arguments after the fact, both
in support of the original judgement [2,3] and against it [4,5,6]. At
least two of these requested a Motion for Reconsideration [4,6], but the
deadline to file one has now passed.
Whether or not the original judgement stands, I contend it would be
beneficial - to public confidence in the judicial system; to future
judges who must investigate precedent; and to nomic recordkeepors and
historians - for the case's judgement to be amended to consider these
additional arguments. Thus, I intend, with 3 support, to enter the
judgement of CFJ 4125 into Moot.
~qenya
I support.
I support as well, but only because moots are cool and don't get called
enough. I found the original judgement more than sufficient and I plan
to vote AFFIRM on the Agoran Decision.
--
Trigon
Popular Polygon
