> That said, what would people be interested in experimenting with in the near > future? Economics? > Internomic relations? Or something other than what I can think of off the top > of my head?
I thought Maud's proposal to give other Nomics limited voting rights within Agora was one of the best ideas in years. I'd love to see it resurrected in some form in the future. Otherwise, I'd really like to see something fresh and unexpected. We've done money, boards, single player wins and team wins, variable voting power, cards and a lot of other stuff. It's not that these ideas don't still have some life in them, but I cringe everytime someone says "let's bring X" and sends out a proposal for something very similar to what we've done in the past. One of the major obstacles we have is there is very little motivation to win right now, since all you get is a title. If there's little motivation to win, there's even littler motivation to play. Perhaps the winner should have some real power vis-a-vis the ruleset? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
