Kerim Aydin wrote: >judge would be allowed to fall back on game custom and precedent, >i.e. use its old definition.
I just noticed that Rule 1586 explicitly prohibits such a course of action: # If the Rules defining some entity are repealed or amended such that # they no longer define that entity, then that entity along with all # its properties shall cease to exist. So, specifically, the numerical comparison properties of Unanimity have ceased to exist. -zefram
