Michael wrote:
If you like, I think my argument is in the best interests of the game:
do you really want an unresolvable CFJ paralysing the system for
evermore? (You might call the same CFJ again I suppose.)
I called CFJ 1606 specifically to fix it. I explained that at the
time. It creates a CFJ identical
in substance to the paradoxical one. That one could be judged on its
merits, and therefore set the precedent for how the paradoxical one
should have been treated had its judge been resolvable. If desired,
CFJ 1606 could be appealed, and the appeals court could use that to
bring the CFJs into harmony.
This was done before the voting period for the retcon proposal
ended. Now that the retcon proposal has passed, I'm pretty much
washing my hands of actually trying to resolve it legally
aside from quibbling details in the discussion forum.
-Goethe
