Kerim Aydin wrote: >The answer is, only if we create a rule with higher precedence.
Not true. That paragraph doesn't prevent repeal of the rule at all. Also, if you want to change the precedence mechanism without repealing R1482, all you have to do is amend R1482 to delete that paragraph. >that clause is not much help, except as a bureaucratic headache, It prevents the adoption of a Power=1 rule that says that rules with lower Power take precedence, and other such things that would create ambiguity about the precedence mechanism. That's what it's for. >as once you get a power-3 coalition, It does not prevent anything at Power=3, true. Requiring AI=3 in order to break precedence ought to be sufficient safeguard, because with AI=3 you can enact a rule that takes precedence over everything else even without changing the precedence mechanism. -zefram
