comex wrote: >I submit the following set of linked CFJs (largely redundant to each other and >to previous CFJs):
I think they're entirely redundant with prior CFJs, except for the question of what the name "Yin Corp" actually refers to now. Initially it referred to a partnership of Zefram and Quazie. If the final structure of entwined partnership agreements and no actual natural persons is a different person from that initial partnership, then we have to decide which one has the better claim on the name "Yin Corp". Or it could just be judged unclear, of course. -zefram
